¤  HOME

¤  412

¤ 414

8 syllabus

 

Classical Theory Summer 2008

 ENROLLMENT FOR THOSE WITH OPEN ENROLLMENT SHEETS:  It should be no problem - you take that sheet to the right office and they will enroll you.

 

 

LINK to lecture topics

Q WEEK 1


Foundation  origins of Soc - change from Catholicism to Protestantism: focus more on individual, less on Church pomp

Historical reference charts:

Q WEEK 2

Marx I

Marx II

quiz know those concepts;
scan I II and III
for highlights

 

minimum 20
questions

TOP 10 in Marx II
class in itself - class for itself
fetishism
surplus value
species being
substructure - superstructure
steps in the evolution of communism
inexorability of the "rubber band" of communism
avarice
objectification - estrangement
alienation
private property
use value

if objects could speak:  value is imposed
Q WEEK 3

Marx III

Review

"Man makes history, but history makes man."

A Marxist/Weberian look thru movies - see this Wed. Wed 4:15 <-- early start !! !!  !!

Thomas Paine and the American Revolution

Q WEEK 4

Durkheim lecture  


Durkheim concepts

QUIZ on Monday - bring Scantron
methodology

mechanical solidarity  -  organic solidarity

restitutive law &  repressive law

anomie & all social rate forms of suicide

elementary forms of religious life - collective consciousness

totems:  the sacred and profane

social fact- sui generis

moral rules - moral regulation.  moral v. technical rule

division of labor:  differentiation & dynamic diversity

equalizing opportunity

associations

social current

Q WEEK 6

Weber review

Economic Power and Status

Market "situation"

Social Action (a group) flowing from Class Interest

Action and types of action

Types of Class Struggle

Status Honor

Ethnic Segregation

Economic Conditions & Status Stratification

Parties

Transition Sociologists Simmel, Mead, Dubois

                                                 

                              

DURKHEIM:  Religion gives us sacred & profane.  That is society.

List "contradictions" flowing from that?

  1. no abortion votes-correlate w being anti- help for poor children, adoption by gays?

  2. "We're good" = "They're bad." (sacred we - profane them)

  3. Father - always God the Father, when we all come from Mother.   Contradiction between the sexes as inferior when complementary.

  4. Churches separate races & wealth.  "You can tell who you are when you go to church on Sunday."

  5. church is holy=outside church not holy.  Piety: Yellow ribbon piety.  God is everywhere, always.

List good "functions" that flow from "church" in society:

  1. diets twice a year (Spring, after fattening up of the Winter and December, prior to fattening up for the celebrations and hibernation)

  2. peace each day or peace each week - community - togetherness - a place to drop competition and unite in sameness

  3. marks cyclic time rather than linear time:  rituals

     

 

immigration - look at two immigrant groups

politics - a particular aspect of our Presidential  campaign

economy - M, D W on "the rich get rich and the poor get poorer"

happening - two current events, e.g., the Texas polygamy case, the mortgage crisis

THINKERS

Marx

Durkheim

Weber

TOPICS

POWER

RELIGION

GENDER

WHO AM I

 

 

  MARX
DURKHEIM
WEBER

POWER

NAFTA
FUNDING of CAMPAIGNS GLOBALISM
TERROR

FUNDAMENTALISM

IMMIGRATION

INTERNET
TECHNOLOGY
à BOMB

IMMIGRATION

RELIGION

BELIEFS

RATIONALITY

 FUNDAMENTALISM
 

FUNDAMENTALISM

RELIG SURGE 

GENDER

RACE

LIBERATION

WOMEN

RACE

AGE

DEGENDERING

DIVERSITY AS RELIGION

WHO AM I

ALIENATION

HUMANITY

ANOMIE

MEANING

TRULY INTERCONNECT

FASTECH

CHANGE - HAPPENING

DIGITAL

educational videos:

g string theory ß 

g exponential view of the future  ß 

g single African Ancestor ß 

 

A Brief HISTORY of Individualism
7,500 years of recorded history 5,500 B.C. - present

What when poplat'n
BIG BANG 13.7 BILLION YEARS  
Age of Earth 4.5 Billion years  
first apes 50 million years ago  
evidence of 1st human beings 150,000 years ago  
1st Human g Single African Ancestor 60,000 years ago 1
Discovery of agriculture 6,000 B.C.  
Ancient Sumerians ... to 5,000 B.C. 5mill
1st recorded history - cuneiform 5,500 B.C.  
Ancient Egyptians from 5,000 B.C.  
Sphinx 5,000 (or 25,000 B.C.?)  
Old Testament written 1200-200 B.C.  
Buddha - Siddhartha 624 B.C. born 100mill
Confucius 551-479 B.C.  
Roman Republic to 44 BC  à empire    

Antiquity á

Jesus Christ & New Testament 0 170mill
Roman empire end 476  
Byzantine Empire to 1453  à Ottoman    
Mohammed c.570 - 632  

 

Dark Ages 476-1000 A.D. 190mill

 ß Middle Ages à 

Enlightenment roots 13th and 14th C humanists  
Renaissance 14thC-17th C:  1300-1600 400mil
Descartes 17th C 1800s 800mill
Enlightenment - a set of attitudes 1700-1804 (Napoleonic War)  

Modern Times â

Fr Revolu & Amer Independence 1776 & 1788  
Cotton Gin, Rail Roads 1794, 1800  
French revolution, American revolution    
Industrial Revolution 19th C:  1800s 900mill
Mandatory public schooling 1850s 1 bill
     
Karl Marx 1848 Communist Manifesto  
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche 1844-1900  writing in the 70s  
Emile Durkheim 1895 The Rules  
Max Weber 1904 1.6
WWI 1914-1918  
WWII 1939-1945  

New Deal Progressives

1932-1979  
Great Depression & New Deal 1929-1936  
"America" - the "50s" 1950s 2.5
Pill, CounterCulture, "Liberat'n", Nixon, Oil crisis 1960-1977 3 bill

Post Modern

Neo Conservatives

1980-2008 4.4
Co-opt Progressive/Counter culture 1980-onward  
Redefine Super Powers 1980-2000 6 bill
Sanction borderless nation states NAFTA 1994-onward  

PoPoMo

Post 9/11 to 2012 7 bill

 

 

 

CLASS EXERCISE
Three "seers" on immgration

how might they see (empirically and conceptually) it as-is and/or
how "fix" or "hope for" it (values). 
E.g., on topic #1, Immigration

  Immigration - just lining up some terms for the topic, 4 terms from each thinker
M 1 global expansion of capitalism; 2 means of subsistence; 3 immiseration; 4 maintain isolation of oppressed;
D 1 language and meaning; 2 moral rules outside of us - breaking down if not enforced? 3 moral rules vs. rules of technique - how to make it? 4 mechanical solidarity within organic solidarity
W 1 technology - fence and other id; 2 new world order-"sacred secularism"; 3 charisma, rationality, tradition (O - C - Mc); 4 status and caste - sparring minorities
  1. immigration

  2. political parties & political movements-3 ways to choose rat trad charisma
    bureaucracy charisma capitalism
  3. ascribed characteristics SAR:  sex (Clinton) age (McCain) race (Obama)
  4. Gender relations - from woman for President to wives of polygamist to 200 lashes for being raped
  5. health of workforce - health of nation or education of nation: 
  6. religion - character - privacy:  separation of church | state.  character | record.  votes | plans.  how do we know another's motive?  Sociological implications of character judgment for politicians.
  7. gangs
  8. technological changes g exponential view of the future  ß 
  9. war - world conditions - global

final paper
emphasize 2 of the 3, but have at least 4 bullet points on each of the 3

 

TAKE HOME Final

Typed

hard copy

2-2.5 page maximum.  no exceptions.  marked down for more.

name on page 1.  no cover sheet.  marked down for cover sheet.

GOOD TITLE

Consider the thinking patterns of our 3 thinkers.  Were they alive today, what would they see?  What would catch their eye?  How would they put the pieces of the big picture together?

Be clear and be specific.  Also be organized:  build.

If you can interconnect the ways they see, all the better.  If you can use the 'quads', all the better.

Focus on 2  of the 3 thinkers.  For the one you do not focus on, say something brief about 3 of concepts he might use to look at your topic.

 

TWO PARTS – ALL WITHIN 3 PIECES OF PAPER (NO COVER SHEET):
Due:  Accepting papers on Monday night - but not officially due until final night, which is Saturday.

think of it this way:

… pick one of the questions available and write about that question from the point of view of two of our three theorists.  What would they be seeing and saying if they were alive and looking at this question?  Mention the third theorist and 2-3-4 concepts of his that he might use, too, but don’t dwell on #3.  Focus on the two you pick.  You pick from one of 5 areas.

Interconnect the views and add depth or breadth to your analysis by couching your awareness in the four quadrants of social life and the movement of social forces through them.

 ALSO, respond to the comment you first made at the beginning of the quarter on the relationship of self to society or self to group. 

Monday night attendance is mandatory:  roll will be taken!

        Pick one (1) of the 5 below

  1. RELIGION TODAY Where is our enlightenment?  Durkheim places religion as the center of all societies:  is it a necessity for our survival?  Is all our advertizing just a by-product of technology? Statistics show that many are beginning to turn to religious and spiritual practices: what is fueling this phenomenon--this new- found-faith?  Comment on how this could come to play when we are media influenced to be Abercombrie, phat farm, Nike, Chanel,  Victoria Secret, Baby Phat, iPod people?  Might Marx think that materialism will forever keep us from our full potential as human beings?

  2. GANGS and ETHNIC CONFLICT are gangs the result of conflict or the product of consensus or the by-product of the changes brought about by the end of the 20th century?  Could a more complete picture of gangs be drawn by thinking with the thinking caps of all three thinkers and weaving them into one complete picture?

  3. IMMIGRATION:  two groups - Latino and Muslim.  How would our thinkers see the 2 groups as the same and how as different? What would they look at and what would they say about what they see from fences to complexions to fashion to gender roles to occupation groups to family structure to media to religious beliefs to political power to status to military - See table below for concepts.

  4. GLOBALISM Look at this link  To what would our thinkers be drawn into thinking about were they to wake up like Rip Van Winkle and gaze at this map?

  5. structure a question and then respond to it about how our thinkers would view education (maybe NCLB) or the changing structure of gender or political contests today.  For  example, one student wrote: 

    How would Marx, Weber and Durkheim view gender changes in same sex marriages? Would they think that same sex marriage is inevitable and that it undermines marriage? Would they view it as something that will become a norm or be beneficial for society? What stance would they take on the gender roles changing through same sex marriages versus heterosexual marriages?

    check out this video - what would the thinkers see and say?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQKK2_Bohto  

   or, do this:        MATCH - who "goes with" whom:

Clinton                 Durkheim

McCain                 Marx

Obama                 Weber

 

nochild left behind YouTube statements from the 3 candidates:

TOPICS:

 

 

pvt