ENROLLMENT
FOR THOSE WITH OPEN ENROLLMENT SHEETS: It
should be no problem - you take that sheet to the
right office and they will enroll you.
|
LINK to lecture |
topics |
|
Foundation origins of Soc -
change from Catholicism to Protestantism: focus more on individual, less on
Church pomp
|
Historical reference charts:
|
|
|
TOP 10 in
Marx II
class in itself - class for itself
fetishism
surplus value
species being
substructure - superstructure
steps in
the evolution of communism
inexorability
of the "rubber band" of communism
avarice
objectification - estrangement
alienation
private property
use value
if
objects could speak: value is imposed |
|
Q
WEEK 3 |
"Man makes history, but
history makes man."
A Marxist/Weberian look thru movies -
see this Wed.
Wed 4:15 <-- early start !! !! !!
Thomas Paine and the American
Revolution |
|
Durkheim
lecture
Durkheim concepts
|
QUIZ on Monday
- bring Scantron
methodology
mechanical
solidarity - organic
solidarity
restitutive
law & repressive law
anomie
& all social rate forms of
suicide
elementary
forms of religious life - collective
consciousness
totems:
the sacred and
profane
social fact- sui generis
moral rules -
moral regulation. moral v. technical
rule
division of
labor:
differentiation & dynamic diversity
equalizing
opportunity
associations
social current
|
|
Weber review |
Economic Power and
Status
Market "situation"
Social Action (a
group) flowing from Class Interest
Action and types of action
Types of Class
Struggle
Status Honor
Ethnic Segregation
Economic Conditions
& Status Stratification
Parties |
|
Transition Sociologists |
Simmel,
Mead, Dubois |
|
DURKHEIM:
Religion gives us sacred & profane. That is
society.
List
"contradictions" flowing
from that?
-
no abortion votes-correlate w being
anti- help for poor
children, adoption by gays?
-
"We're good" =
"They're bad." (sacred we - profane them)
-
Father - always God
the Father, when we all come from Mother.
Contradiction between the sexes as inferior when
complementary.
-
Churches separate
races & wealth.
"You can tell who you are when you go to church on
Sunday."
-
church is holy=outside church not holy. Piety:
Yellow ribbon piety. God is everywhere,
always.
List
good "functions" that flow from "church" in society:
-
diets twice a year
(Spring, after fattening up of the Winter and
December, prior to fattening up for the celebrations
and hibernation)
-
peace each day or
peace each week - community - togetherness - a place
to drop competition and unite in sameness
-
marks cyclic time
rather than linear time: rituals
|
|
|
immigration - look at two immigrant
groups
politics - a particular aspect of our
Presidential campaign
economy - M, D W on "the rich
get rich and the poor get poorer"
happening - two current events, e.g., the Texas
polygamy case, the mortgage crisis
| |
MARX |
DURKHEIM
|
WEBER
|
|
POWER |
NAFTA
FUNDING of CAMPAIGNS GLOBALISM
TERROR |
FUNDAMENTALISM
IMMIGRATION |
INTERNET
TECHNOLOGY à BOMB
IMMIGRATION |
|
RELIGION
BELIEFS
RATIONALITY |
FUNDAMENTALISM
|
FUNDAMENTALISM |
RELIG
SURGE |
|
GENDER
RACE |
LIBERATION |
WOMEN
RACE
AGE |
DEGENDERING
DIVERSITY AS RELIGION |
|
WHO AM
I |
ALIENATION
HUMANITY |
ANOMIE
MEANING
TRULY
INTERCONNECT |
FASTECH
CHANGE
- HAPPENING
DIGITAL |
educational videos:
g
string
theory
ß
g
exponential
view of the future
ß
g
single
African Ancestor
ß
|
|
A Brief HISTORY of
Individualism
7,500 years of recorded history 5,500 B.C. - present
| What |
when |
poplat'n |
| BIG BANG
|
13.7
BILLION YEARS |
|
| Age of
Earth |
4.5
Billion years |
|
| first
apes |
50
million years ago |
|
|
evidence of 1st human beings |
150,000 years ago |
|
| 1st
Human
g
Single
African Ancestor |
60,000
years ago |
1 |
|
Discovery of
agriculture |
6,000 B.C. |
|
|
Ancient Sumerians |
... to
5,000 B.C. |
5mill |
| 1st
recorded history - cuneiform |
5,500
B.C. |
|
|
Ancient Egyptians |
from
5,000 B.C. |
|
| Sphinx |
5,000
(or 25,000 B.C.?) |
|
| Old
Testament written |
1200-200 B.C. |
|
|
Buddha
- Siddhartha |
624
B.C. born |
100mill |
|
Confucius |
551-479 B.C. |
|
| Roman
Republic to 44 BC
à empire |
|
|
|
Antiquity á
|
|
Jesus Christ & New Testament |
0 |
170mill |
| Roman
empire end |
476 |
|
|
Byzantine Empire to 1453
à
Ottoman |
|
|
|
Mohammed |
c.570
- 632 |
|
|
|
| Dark
Ages |
476-1000 A.D. |
190mill |
|
ß
Middle Ages
à
|
|
Enlightenment roots |
13th
and 14th C humanists |
|
|
Renaissance |
14thC-17th C: 1300-1600 |
400mil |
|
Descartes |
17th C
1800s |
800mill |
|
Enlightenment - a set of attitudes |
1700-1804 (Napoleonic War) |
|
|
Modern Times â |
| Fr Revolu & Amer
Independence |
1776 & 1788 |
|
| Cotton
Gin, Rail Roads |
1794,
1800 |
|
| French
revolution, American revolution |
|
|
|
Industrial Revolution |
19th
C: 1800s |
900mill |
|
Mandatory public schooling |
1850s |
1 bill |
| |
|
|
| Karl
Marx |
1848
Communist Manifesto |
|
|
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche |
1844-1900 writing in the 70s |
|
| Emile
Durkheim |
1895
The Rules |
|
| Max
Weber |
1904 |
1.6 |
| WWI |
1914-1918 |
|
| WWII |
1939-1945 |
|
|
New
Deal Progressives |
1932-1979 |
|
| Great
Depression & New Deal |
1929-1936 |
|
|
"America" - the "50s" |
1950s |
2.5 |
| Pill,
CounterCulture, "Liberat'n", Nixon, Oil crisis |
1960-1977 |
3 bill |
|
Post
Modern |
|
Neo
Conservatives |
1980-2008 |
4.4 |
| Co-opt
Progressive/Counter culture |
1980-onward |
|
|
Redefine Super Powers |
1980-2000 |
6 bill |
|
Sanction borderless nation states NAFTA |
1994-onward |
|
|
PoPoMo |
| Post
9/11 |
to
2012 |
7 bill |
|
|
|
|
CLASS EXERCISE
Three "seers" on immgration
how might they
see (empirically and conceptually) it as-is
and/or
how "fix" or "hope for" it (values).
E.g., on topic #1, Immigration
| |
Immigration - just lining up some
terms for the topic, 4 terms from
each thinker |
|
M |
1
global expansion of capitalism; 2
means of subsistence; 3
immiseration; 4 maintain isolation
of oppressed; |
|
D |
1
language and meaning; 2 moral rules
outside of us - breaking down if not
enforced? 3 moral rules vs. rules of
technique - how to make it? 4
mechanical solidarity within organic
solidarity |
|
W |
1
technology - fence and other id; 2
new world order-"sacred secularism";
3 charisma, rationality, tradition
(O - C - Mc); 4 status and caste -
sparring minorities |
-
immigration
-
political parties & political
movements-3 ways to choose
rat
trad
charisma
bureaucracy charisma
capitalism
-
ascribed characteristics SAR:
sex (Clinton) age (McCain) race (Obama)
-
Gender relations - from woman for
President to wives of polygamist to 200
lashes for being raped
-
health of workforce - health of
nation or education of nation:
-
religion - character - privacy:
separation of church | state.
character | record. votes |
plans. how do we know another's
motive? Sociological implications
of character judgment for politicians.
-
gangs
-
technological changes
g
exponential
view of the future
ß
- war
- world conditions - global
final
paper
emphasize 2 of the 3, but have at least 4
bullet points on each of the 3 |
TAKE
HOME Final
|
Typed
hard copy
2-2.5 page
maximum. no exceptions. marked down
for more.
name on page 1.
no cover sheet. marked down for cover
sheet.
GOOD TITLE
Consider the
thinking patterns of our 3 thinkers. Were
they alive today, what would they see?
What would catch their eye? How would they
put the pieces of the big picture together?
Be clear and be
specific. Also be organized: build.
If you can
interconnect the ways they see, all the better.
If you can use the 'quads', all the better.
Focus on 2
of the 3 thinkers. For the one you do not
focus on, say something brief about 3 of
concepts he might use to look at your topic.
|
TWO PARTS – ALL WITHIN 3 PIECES
OF PAPER (NO COVER SHEET):
Due: Accepting papers on Monday night -
but not officially due until final night, which
is Saturday.
| think of it this way:
… pick one of the questions available and write about that
question from the point of view of
two of our three theorists. What
would they be seeing and saying if
they were alive and looking at this
question? Mention the third
theorist and 2-3-4 concepts of his
that he might use, too, but don’t
dwell on #3. Focus on the two you
pick. You pick from one of 5 areas.
Interconnect the views and add
depth or breadth to your analysis by couching
your awareness in the four quadrants of social
life and the movement of social forces through
them.
ALSO, respond to the comment you first made at the beginning of
the quarter on the relationship of
self to society or self to group.
|
Monday night attendance is mandatory: roll
will be taken!
Pick one (1) of the 5 below
-
RELIGION TODAY Where is our enlightenment?
Durkheim places religion as the center of
all societies: is it a necessity for
our survival? Is all our advertizing
just a by-product of technology? Statistics
show that many are beginning to turn to
religious and spiritual practices: what is
fueling this phenomenon--this new-
found-faith? Comment on how this could
come to play when we are media influenced to
be Abercombrie, phat farm, Nike, Chanel,
Victoria Secret, Baby Phat, iPod people?
Might Marx think that materialism will
forever keep us from our full potential as
human beings?
-
GANGS and ETHNIC CONFLICT are gangs the
result of conflict or the product of
consensus or the by-product of the changes
brought about by the end of the 20th
century? Could a more complete picture
of gangs be drawn by thinking with the
thinking caps of all three thinkers and
weaving them into one complete picture?
-
IMMIGRATION: two groups - Latino and
Muslim. How would our thinkers see the
2 groups as the same and how as different?
What would they look at and what would they
say about what they see from fences to
complexions to fashion to gender roles to
occupation groups to family structure to
media to religious beliefs to political
power to status to military - See table
below for concepts.
-
GLOBALISM Look at
this link To what would our
thinkers be drawn into thinking about were
they to wake up like Rip Van Winkle and gaze
at this map?
-
structure a question and then respond to it
about how our thinkers would view education
(maybe NCLB) or the changing structure of
gender or political contests today.
For example, one student wrote:
How would Marx, Weber and Durkheim view
gender changes in same sex marriages? Would
they think that same sex marriage is
inevitable and that it undermines marriage?
Would they view it as something that will
become a norm or be beneficial for society?
What stance would they take on the gender
roles changing through same sex marriages
versus heterosexual marriages?
check out this video - what would the
thinkers see and say?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQKK2_Bohto
or, do this: MATCH
- who "goes with" whom:
Clinton Durkheim
McCain Marx
Obama Weber
nochild left behind YouTube statements from the
3 candidates:
|
|
TOPICS:
|
OBAMA: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsVimwm6xQ4&feature=related
MCCAIN: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGnhQM3PRlQ&feature=related